Skip to content
Airleaf

Aurangābād vs Mohammadpur

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Mohammadpur has more tree cover — 95.5% against 38.4%.

Aurangābād has cleaner air right now — AQI 103 against 138.

Tree cover gap
57.1 points
Mohammadpur is ahead.
Air quality gap
35 AQI
Aurangābād is cleaner.
Trees between them
179K
Mohammadpur has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

38.4%

95.5%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

103 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

138 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

120K

300K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

2.6M kg

6.6M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

36.4 µg/m³

50.4 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

42.6 µg/m³

58.9 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

9.6 µg/m³

5.9 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

87 µg/m³

159 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

AurangābādMohammadpur· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
07515022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Aurangābād and Mohammadpur
DayAurangābādMohammadpur
22 Sept8797
23 Sept4259
24 Sept2943
25 Sept3041
26 Sept4455
27 Sept10898
28 Sept126129

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Mohammadpur leads here at 95.5%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Aurangābād reads 103 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Mohammadpur reads 138 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) right now.

Frequently asked

Aurangābād and Mohammadpur, answered

Which has more trees, Aurangābād or Mohammadpur?

Mohammadpur, with roughly 299,722 trees inside its 2 km radius against 120,396. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Mohammadpur has the denser canopy at 95.5%.

Which has better air quality, Aurangābād or Mohammadpur?

Aurangābād right now, at AQI 103 against 138 — a gap of 35 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Aurangābād needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Mohammadpur about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Aurangābād with somewhere else

This place

Aurangābād

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.