Asunción vs Novo Hamburgo
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Novo Hamburgo has more tree cover — 33.5% against 20.9%.
Novo Hamburgo has cleaner air right now — AQI 42 against 82.
- Tree cover gap
- 12.6 points
- Novo Hamburgo is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 40 AQI
- Novo Hamburgo is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 47.8K
- Novo Hamburgo has more standing.
Paraguay
Brazil
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
20.9%
33.5%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
82 · Moderate
42 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
57.5K
105K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
25.0K
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.3M kg
2.3M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Asunción is read from nearby ground stations and Novo Hamburgo is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
26.9 µg/m³
10 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Asunción | Novo Hamburgo |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 25 | 25 |
| 23 Sept | 29 | 37 |
| 24 Sept | 40 | 64 |
| 25 Sept | 44 | 52 |
| 26 Sept | 36 | 63 |
| 27 Sept | 47 | 41 |
| 28 Sept | 41 | 40 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Novo Hamburgo leads here at 33.5%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Asunción reads 82 (moderate) and Novo Hamburgo reads 42 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Asunción and Novo Hamburgo, answered
Which has more trees, Asunción or Novo Hamburgo?
Novo Hamburgo, with roughly 105,243 trees inside its 2 km radius against 57,452. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Novo Hamburgo has the denser canopy at 33.5%.
Which has better air quality, Asunción or Novo Hamburgo?
Novo Hamburgo right now, at AQI 42 against 82 — a gap of 40 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Asunción needs about 25,015 more to reach its canopy target, and Novo Hamburgo about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Asunción vs San Lorenzo40% tree cover · AQI 63Compare
- Asunción vs Itauguá71% tree cover · AQI 70Compare
- Asunción vs Formosa30% tree cover · AQI 105Compare
- Asunción vs Corrientes14% tree cover · AQI 38Compare
- Asunción vs Canoas27% tree cover · AQI 22Compare
- Asunción vs Gravataí49% tree cover · AQI 24Compare
Build your own
Compare Asunción with somewhere else
This place
Asunción
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.