Ashkelon vs Netanya
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Netanya has more tree cover — 12.8% against 10.3%.
Ashkelon has cleaner air right now — AQI 53 against 66.
- Tree cover gap
- 2.5 points
- Netanya is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 13 AQI
- Ashkelon is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 928
- Ashkelon has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
10.3%
12.8%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
53 · Moderate
66 · Moderate
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
32.3K
31.4K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
61.8K
42.1K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
710K kg
690K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are read from nearby ground stations.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
12.9 µg/m³
19.4 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Ashkelon | Netanya |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 40 | 41 |
| 23 Sept | 42 | 41 |
| 24 Sept | 44 | 41 |
| 25 Sept | 39 | 44 |
| 26 Sept | 39 | 44 |
| 27 Sept | 40 | 42 |
| 28 Sept | 41 | 36 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Netanya leads here at 12.8%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Ashkelon reads 53 (moderate) and Netanya reads 66 (moderate) right now.
Frequently asked
Ashkelon and Netanya, answered
Which has more trees, Ashkelon or Netanya?
Ashkelon, with roughly 32,294 trees inside its 2 km radius against 31,366. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Netanya has the denser canopy at 12.8%.
Which has better air quality, Ashkelon or Netanya?
Ashkelon right now, at AQI 53 against 66 — a gap of 13 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Ashkelon needs about 61,766 more to reach its canopy target, and Netanya about 42,148. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Ashkelon vs Ashdod12% tree cover · AQI 53Compare
- Ashkelon vs Gaza0% tree cover · AQI 53Compare
- Ashkelon vs Reẖovot16% tree cover · AQI 39Compare
- Ashkelon vs Rishon LeTsiyyon15% tree cover · AQI 39Compare
- Ashkelon vs Kfar Saba17% tree cover · AQI 66Compare
- Ashkelon vs Petaẖ Tiqva14% tree cover · AQI 30Compare
Build your own
Compare Ashkelon with somewhere else
This place
Ashkelon
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.