Skip to content
Airleaf

Arnavutköy vs Başakşehir

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Arnavutköy has more tree cover — 37.6% against 18.6%.

Arnavutköy has cleaner air right now — AQI 32 against 168.

Tree cover gap
19.0 points
Arnavutköy is ahead.
Air quality gap
136 AQI
Arnavutköy is cleaner.
Trees between them
59.7K
Arnavutköy has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

37.6%

18.6%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

32 · Good

168 · Unhealthy

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

118K

58.4K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

67.2K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

2.6M kg

1.3M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Başakşehir is read from nearby ground stations and Arnavutköy is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

6 µg/m³

88.7 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

9.5 µg/m³

107.9 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

ArnavutköyBaşakşehir· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0255022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Arnavutköy and Başakşehir
DayArnavutköyBaşakşehir
22 Sept3434
23 Sept3030
24 Sept2828
25 Sept4141
26 Sept3333
27 Sept3636
28 Sept3434

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Arnavutköy leads here at 37.6%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Arnavutköy reads 32 (good) and Başakşehir reads 168 (unhealthy) right now.

Frequently asked

Arnavutköy and Başakşehir, answered

Which has more trees, Arnavutköy or Başakşehir?

Arnavutköy, with roughly 118,124 trees inside its 2 km radius against 58,375. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Arnavutköy has the denser canopy at 37.6%.

Which has better air quality, Arnavutköy or Başakşehir?

Arnavutköy right now, at AQI 32 against 168 — a gap of 136 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Arnavutköy needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Başakşehir about 67,163. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Arnavutköy with somewhere else

This place

Arnavutköy

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.