Arnavutköy vs Bandırma
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Arnavutköy has more tree cover — 37.6% against 11.2%.
Arnavutköy has cleaner air right now — AQI 32 against 35.
- Tree cover gap
- 26.4 points
- Arnavutköy is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 3 AQI
- Arnavutköy is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 91.7K
- Arnavutköy has more standing.
Turkey
Turkey
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
37.6%
11.2%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
32 · Good
35 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
118K
26.4K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
44.3K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
2.6M kg
581K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
6 µg/m³
5.1 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
9.5 µg/m³
8.1 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
2.2 µg/m³
2 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
64 µg/m³
68 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Arnavutköy | Bandırma |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 34 | 39 |
| 23 Sept | 30 | 31 |
| 24 Sept | 28 | 35 |
| 25 Sept | 41 | 52 |
| 26 Sept | 33 | 44 |
| 27 Sept | 36 | 37 |
| 28 Sept | 34 | 35 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Arnavutköy leads here at 37.6%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Arnavutköy reads 32 (good) and Bandırma reads 35 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Arnavutköy and Bandırma, answered
Which has more trees, Arnavutköy or Bandırma?
Arnavutköy, with roughly 118,124 trees inside its 2 km radius against 26,389. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Arnavutköy has the denser canopy at 37.6%.
Which has better air quality, Arnavutköy or Bandırma?
Arnavutköy right now, at AQI 32 against 35 — a gap of 3 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Arnavutköy needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Bandırma about 44,296. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Arnavutköy vs Esenyurt6% tree cover · AQI 32Compare
- Arnavutköy vs Bağcılar6% tree cover · AQI 76Compare
- Arnavutköy vs Küçükçekmece17% tree cover · AQI 75Compare
- Arnavutköy vs Istanbul11% tree cover · AQI 75Compare
- Arnavutköy vs Mustafakemalpaşa32% tree cover · AQI 31Compare
- Arnavutköy vs Balıkesir10% tree cover · AQI 32Compare
Build your own
Compare Arnavutköy with somewhere else
This place
Arnavutköy
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.