Ar Rayyān vs Dammam
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Ar Rayyān has more tree cover — 8.6% against 1.9%.
Ar Rayyān has cleaner air right now — AQI 104 against 135.
- Tree cover gap
- 6.7 points
- Ar Rayyān is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 31 AQI
- Ar Rayyān is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 21.0K
- Ar Rayyān has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
8.6%
1.9%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
104 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
135 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
27.0K
6.0K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
82.9K
104K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
594K kg
131K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Dammam is read from nearby ground stations and Ar Rayyān is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
36.8 µg/m³
49.5 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Ar Rayyān | Dammam |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 140 | 130 |
| 23 Sept | 112 | 140 |
| 24 Sept | 134 | 158 |
| 25 Sept | 161 | 161 |
| 26 Sept | 139 | 121 |
| 27 Sept | 104 | 149 |
| 28 Sept | 97 | 136 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Ar Rayyān leads here at 8.6%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Ar Rayyān reads 104 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Dammam reads 135 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) right now.
Frequently asked
Ar Rayyān and Dammam, answered
Which has more trees, Ar Rayyān or Dammam?
Ar Rayyān, with roughly 27,018 trees inside its 2 km radius against 5,969. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Ar Rayyān has the denser canopy at 8.6%.
Which has better air quality, Ar Rayyān or Dammam?
Ar Rayyān right now, at AQI 104 against 135 — a gap of 31 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Ar Rayyān needs about 82,938 more to reach its canopy target, and Dammam about 103,987. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Ar Rayyān vs Lusail2% tree cover · AQI 107Compare
- Ar Rayyān vs Az̧ Z̧a‘āyin1% tree cover · AQI 102Compare
- Ar Rayyān vs Umm Ghuwaylīnah0% tree cover · AQI 130Compare
- Ar Rayyān vs Madīnat Ḩamad3% tree cover · AQI 152Compare
- Ar Rayyān vs Khobar2% tree cover · AQI 152Compare
- Ar Rayyān vs Manama3% tree cover · AQI 152Compare
Build your own
Compare Ar Rayyān with somewhere else
This place
Ar Rayyān
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.