Skip to content
Airleaf

Andīmeshk vs Khomeynī Shahr

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Khomeynī Shahr has more tree cover — 5.0% against 4.7%.

Khomeynī Shahr has cleaner air right now — AQI 89 against 109.

Tree cover gap
0.3 points
Khomeynī Shahr is ahead.
Air quality gap
20 AQI
Khomeynī Shahr is cleaner.
Trees between them
943
Khomeynī Shahr has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

4.7%

5.0%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

109 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

89 · Moderate

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

14.8K

15.7K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

95.2K

78.5K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

325K kg

346K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

38 µg/m³

30.3 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

172.3 µg/m³

53.6 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

20.4 µg/m³

50.8 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

11 µg/m³

6 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

AndīmeshkKhomeynī Shahr· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
08817522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Andīmeshk and Khomeynī Shahr
DayAndīmeshkKhomeynī Shahr
22 Sept13656
23 Sept9972
24 Sept15083
25 Sept9085
26 Sept13175
27 Sept15784
28 Sept16585

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Khomeynī Shahr leads here at 5.0%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Andīmeshk reads 109 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Khomeynī Shahr reads 89 (moderate) right now.

Frequently asked

Andīmeshk and Khomeynī Shahr, answered

Which has more trees, Andīmeshk or Khomeynī Shahr?

Khomeynī Shahr, with roughly 15,708 trees inside its 2 km radius against 14,765. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Khomeynī Shahr has the denser canopy at 5.0%.

Which has better air quality, Andīmeshk or Khomeynī Shahr?

Khomeynī Shahr right now, at AQI 89 against 109 — a gap of 20 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Andīmeshk needs about 95,190 more to reach its canopy target, and Khomeynī Shahr about 78,540. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Andīmeshk with somewhere else

This place

Andīmeshk

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.