Skip to content
Airleaf

Amsterdam vs Nijmegen

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Nijmegen has more tree cover — 52.7% against 20.7%.

Amsterdam has cleaner air right now — AQI 26 against 40.

Tree cover gap
32.0 points
Nijmegen is ahead.
Air quality gap
14 AQI
Amsterdam is cleaner.
Trees between them
97.2K
Nijmegen has more standing.
Amsterdam

The Netherlands

Nijmegen

The Netherlands

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

20.7%

52.7%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

26 · Good

40 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

55.9K

153K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

25.1K

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

1.2M kg

3.4M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are read from nearby ground stations.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

6.3 µg/m³

9.5 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

14.5 µg/m³

23.4 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

21.9 µg/m³

20.2 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

54.2 µg/m³

54.8 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

AmsterdamNijmegen· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Amsterdam and Nijmegen
DayAmsterdamNijmegen
22 Sept4447
23 Sept5958
24 Sept2627
25 Sept5246
26 Sept4650
27 Sept6264
28 Sept4760

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Nijmegen leads here at 52.7%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Amsterdam reads 26 (good) and Nijmegen reads 40 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Amsterdam and Nijmegen, answered

Which has more trees, Amsterdam or Nijmegen?

Nijmegen, with roughly 153,145 trees inside its 2 km radius against 55,927. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Nijmegen has the denser canopy at 52.7%.

Which has better air quality, Amsterdam or Nijmegen?

Amsterdam right now, at AQI 26 against 40 — a gap of 14 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Amsterdam needs about 25,126 more to reach its canopy target, and Nijmegen about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Amsterdam with somewhere else

This place

Amsterdam

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.