Skip to content
Airleaf

Alappuzha vs Malappuram

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Malappuram has more tree cover — 80.1% against 46.4%.

Alappuzha has cleaner air right now — AQI 65 against 77.

Tree cover gap
33.7 points
Malappuram is ahead.
Air quality gap
12 AQI
Alappuzha is cleaner.
Trees between them
137K
Malappuram has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

46.4%

80.1%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

65 · Moderate

77 · Moderate

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

114K

251K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

2.5M kg

5.5M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Malappuram is read from nearby ground stations and Alappuzha is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

18.7 µg/m³

24.5 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

AlappuzhaMalappuram· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
05010022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Alappuzha and Malappuram
DayAlappuzhaMalappuram
22 Sept3865
23 Sept4478
24 Sept6683
25 Sept6948
26 Sept5670
27 Sept4877
28 Sept5986

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Malappuram leads here at 80.1%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Alappuzha reads 65 (moderate) and Malappuram reads 77 (moderate) right now.

Frequently asked

Alappuzha and Malappuram, answered

Which has more trees, Alappuzha or Malappuram?

Malappuram, with roughly 251,138 trees inside its 2 km radius against 113,992. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Malappuram has the denser canopy at 80.1%.

Which has better air quality, Alappuzha or Malappuram?

Alappuzha right now, at AQI 65 against 77 — a gap of 12 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Alappuzha needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Malappuram about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Alappuzha with somewhere else

This place

Alappuzha

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.