Al Qāmishlī vs Osmaniye
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Osmaniye has more tree cover — 14.4% against 1.9%.
Al Qāmishlī has cleaner air right now — AQI 29 against 32.
- Tree cover gap
- 12.5 points
- Osmaniye is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 3 AQI
- Al Qāmishlī is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 39.3K
- Osmaniye has more standing.
Syria
Turkey
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
1.9%
14.4%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
29 · Good
32 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
6.0K
45.2K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
88.3K
49.0K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
131K kg
995K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
6.9 µg/m³
3.7 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
12.9 µg/m³
4 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
0.7 µg/m³
2.8 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
82 µg/m³
72 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Al Qāmishlī | Osmaniye |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 67 | 51 |
| 23 Sept | 61 | 43 |
| 24 Sept | 39 | 42 |
| 25 Sept | 39 | 42 |
| 26 Sept | 53 | 55 |
| 27 Sept | 58 | 52 |
| 28 Sept | 40 | 37 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Osmaniye leads here at 14.4%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Al Qāmishlī reads 29 (good) and Osmaniye reads 32 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Al Qāmishlī and Osmaniye, answered
Which has more trees, Al Qāmishlī or Osmaniye?
Osmaniye, with roughly 45,239 trees inside its 2 km radius against 5,969. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Osmaniye has the denser canopy at 14.4%.
Which has better air quality, Al Qāmishlī or Osmaniye?
Al Qāmishlī right now, at AQI 29 against 32 — a gap of 3 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Al Qāmishlī needs about 88,279 more to reach its canopy target, and Osmaniye about 49,009. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Al Qāmishlī vs Mardin2% tree cover · AQI 37Compare
- Al Qāmishlī vs Kızıltepe7% tree cover · AQI 41Compare
- Al Qāmishlī vs Al Ḩasakah1% tree cover · AQI 30Compare
- Al Qāmishlī vs Cizre5% tree cover · AQI 34Compare
- Al Qāmishlī vs İskenderun8% tree cover · AQI 72Compare
- Al Qāmishlī vs Arsuz41% tree cover · AQI 41Compare
Build your own
Compare Al Qāmishlī with somewhere else
This place
Al Qāmishlī
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.