Skip to content
Airleaf

Al Mawşil al Jadīdah vs Bāneh

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Bāneh has more tree cover — 1.6% against 0.6%.

Bāneh has cleaner air right now — AQI 38 against 42.

Tree cover gap
1.0 points
Bāneh is ahead.
Air quality gap
4 AQI
Bāneh is cleaner.
Trees between them
3.1K
Bāneh has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

0.6%

1.6%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

42 · Good

38 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

1.9K

5.0K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

92.4K

89.2K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

41.5K kg

111K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Bāneh is read from nearby ground stations and Al Mawşil al Jadīdah is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

10.1 µg/m³

9.2 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

18.5 µg/m³

18.9 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

3.4 µg/m³

31.6 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

87 µg/m³

23 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Al Mawşil al JadīdahBāneh· daily US EPA index, last 6 days
05010022 Sept25 Sept27 Sept
Daily air quality index for Al Mawşil al Jadīdah and Bāneh
DayAl Mawşil al JadīdahBāneh
22 Sept5988
23 Sept7481
24 Sept4264
25 Sept4040
26 Sept5044
27 Sept6041

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Bāneh leads here at 1.6%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Al Mawşil al Jadīdah reads 42 (good) and Bāneh reads 38 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Al Mawşil al Jadīdah and Bāneh, answered

Which has more trees, Al Mawşil al Jadīdah or Bāneh?

Bāneh, with roughly 5,027 trees inside its 2 km radius against 1,885. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Bāneh has the denser canopy at 1.6%.

Which has better air quality, Al Mawşil al Jadīdah or Bāneh?

Bāneh right now, at AQI 38 against 42 — a gap of 4 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Al Mawşil al Jadīdah needs about 92,363 more to reach its canopy target, and Bāneh about 89,221. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Al Mawşil al Jadīdah with somewhere else

This place

Al Mawşil al Jadīdah

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.