Skip to content
Airleaf

Al Jubayl vs Ar Rayyān

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Ar Rayyān has more tree cover — 8.6% against 0.9%.

Ar Rayyān has cleaner air right now — AQI 115 against 120.

Tree cover gap
7.7 points
Ar Rayyān is ahead.
Air quality gap
5 AQI
Ar Rayyān is cleaner.
Trees between them
24.2K
Ar Rayyān has more standing.
Al Jubayl

Saudi Arabia

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

0.9%

8.6%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

120 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

115 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

2.8K

27.0K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

107K

82.9K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

62.2K kg

594K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

43.3 µg/m³

41.2 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

76.8 µg/m³

105.7 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

10.8 µg/m³

29.4 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

108 µg/m³

115 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Al JubaylAr Rayyān· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
010020022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Al Jubayl and Ar Rayyān
DayAl JubaylAr Rayyān
22 Sept123140
23 Sept151112
24 Sept178134
25 Sept144161
26 Sept126139
27 Sept137104
28 Sept143100

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Ar Rayyān leads here at 8.6%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Al Jubayl reads 120 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Ar Rayyān reads 115 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) right now.

Frequently asked

Al Jubayl and Ar Rayyān, answered

Which has more trees, Al Jubayl or Ar Rayyān?

Ar Rayyān, with roughly 27,018 trees inside its 2 km radius against 2,827. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Ar Rayyān has the denser canopy at 8.6%.

Which has better air quality, Al Jubayl or Ar Rayyān?

Ar Rayyān right now, at AQI 115 against 120 — a gap of 5 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Al Jubayl needs about 107,128 more to reach its canopy target, and Ar Rayyān about 82,938. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Al Jubayl with somewhere else

This place

Al Jubayl

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.