Skip to content
Airleaf

Al Hufūf vs Umm Ghuwaylīnah

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Al Hufūf has more tree cover — 2.5% against 0.2%.

Umm Ghuwaylīnah has cleaner air right now — AQI 131 against 134.

Tree cover gap
2.3 points
Al Hufūf is ahead.
Air quality gap
3 AQI
Umm Ghuwaylīnah is cleaner.
Trees between them
7.2K
Al Hufūf has more standing.
Al Hufūf

Saudi Arabia

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

2.5%

0.2%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

134 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

131 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

7.9K

628

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

102K

109K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

173K kg

13.8K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

48.9 µg/m³

47.8 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

87.1 µg/m³

88.9 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

16.6 µg/m³

37.6 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

61 µg/m³

67 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Al HufūfUmm Ghuwaylīnah· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
07515022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Al Hufūf and Umm Ghuwaylīnah
DayAl HufūfUmm Ghuwaylīnah
22 Sept133124
23 Sept133134
24 Sept128138
25 Sept107148
26 Sept109127
27 Sept141129
28 Sept143123

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Al Hufūf leads here at 2.5%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Al Hufūf reads 134 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Umm Ghuwaylīnah reads 131 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) right now.

Frequently asked

Al Hufūf and Umm Ghuwaylīnah, answered

Which has more trees, Al Hufūf or Umm Ghuwaylīnah?

Al Hufūf, with roughly 7,854 trees inside its 2 km radius against 628. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Al Hufūf has the denser canopy at 2.5%.

Which has better air quality, Al Hufūf or Umm Ghuwaylīnah?

Umm Ghuwaylīnah right now, at AQI 131 against 134 — a gap of 3 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Al Hufūf needs about 102,102 more to reach its canopy target, and Umm Ghuwaylīnah about 109,327. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Al Hufūf with somewhere else

This place

Al Hufūf

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.