Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān vs Bilqās
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Bilqās has more tree cover — 39.9% against 2.6%.
Bilqās has cleaner air right now — AQI 40 against 51.
- Tree cover gap
- 37.3 points
- Bilqās is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 11 AQI
- Bilqās is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 117K
- Bilqās has more standing.
Egypt
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
2.6%
39.9%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
51 · Moderate
40 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
8.2K
125K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
86.1K
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
180K kg
2.8M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān is read from nearby ground stations and Bilqās is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
12.1 µg/m³
8.6 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān | Bilqās |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 56 | 46 |
| 23 Sept | 61 | 46 |
| 24 Sept | 51 | 41 |
| 25 Sept | 43 | 37 |
| 26 Sept | 47 | 36 |
| 27 Sept | 47 | 46 |
| 28 Sept | 53 | 38 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Bilqās leads here at 39.9%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān reads 51 (moderate) and Bilqās reads 40 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān and Bilqās, answered
Which has more trees, Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān or Bilqās?
Bilqās, with roughly 125,350 trees inside its 2 km radius against 8,168. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Bilqās has the denser canopy at 39.9%.
Which has better air quality, Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān or Bilqās?
Bilqās right now, at AQI 40 against 51 — a gap of 11 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān needs about 86,080 more to reach its canopy target, and Bilqās about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān vs Bilbeis32% tree cover · AQI 33Compare
- Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān vs Al-'Ubūr7% tree cover · AQI 51Compare
- Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān vs New Cairo10% tree cover · AQI 51Compare
- Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān vs Zagazig7% tree cover · AQI 28Compare
- Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān vs Al Mansurah1% tree cover · AQI 34Compare
- Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān vs Dikirnis50% tree cover · AQI 21Compare
Build your own
Compare Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān with somewhere else
This place
Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.