Al ‘Amārah vs Baghdad
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Al ‘Amārah has more tree cover — 2.3% against 2.2%.
Baghdad has cleaner air right now — AQI 74 against 84.
- Tree cover gap
- 0.1 points
- Al ‘Amārah is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 10 AQI
- Baghdad is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 645
- Al ‘Amārah has more standing.
Iraq
Iraq
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
2.3%
2.2%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
84 · Moderate
74 · Moderate
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
7.2K
6.6K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
86.8K
82.9K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
158K kg
144K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Baghdad is read from nearby ground stations and Al ‘Amārah is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
27.9 µg/m³
22.9 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Al ‘Amārah | Baghdad |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 90 | 79 |
| 23 Sept | 196 | 107 |
| 24 Sept | 402 | 58 |
| 25 Sept | 428 | 54 |
| 26 Sept | 260 | 65 |
| 27 Sept | 170 | 88 |
| 28 Sept | 112 | 100 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Al ‘Amārah leads here at 2.3%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Al ‘Amārah reads 84 (moderate) and Baghdad reads 74 (moderate) right now.
Frequently asked
Al ‘Amārah and Baghdad, answered
Which has more trees, Al ‘Amārah or Baghdad?
Al ‘Amārah, with roughly 7,204 trees inside its 2 km radius against 6,559. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Al ‘Amārah has the denser canopy at 2.3%.
Which has better air quality, Al ‘Amārah or Baghdad?
Baghdad right now, at AQI 74 against 84 — a gap of 10 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Al ‘Amārah needs about 86,761 more to reach its canopy target, and Baghdad about 82,882. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Al ‘Amārah vs Mostafa16% tree cover · AQI 81Compare
- Al ‘Amārah vs Al Qurnah4% tree cover · AQI 75Compare
- Al ‘Amārah vs Al Madīnah17% tree cover · AQI 62Compare
- Al ‘Amārah vs Qal‘at Sukkar7% tree cover · AQI 65Compare
- Al ‘Amārah vs Abū Ghurayb5% tree cover · AQI 74Compare
- Al ‘Amārah vs Al Maḩmūdīyah4% tree cover · AQI 87Compare
Build your own
Compare Al ‘Amārah with somewhere else
This place
Al ‘Amārah
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.