Skip to content
Airleaf

Al Aḩmadī vs Khorramshahr

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Khorramshahr has more tree cover — 4.4% against 1.2%.

Khorramshahr has cleaner air right now — AQI 102 against 141.

Tree cover gap
3.2 points
Khorramshahr is ahead.
Air quality gap
39 AQI
Khorramshahr is cleaner.
Trees between them
9.6K
Khorramshahr has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

1.2%

4.4%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

141 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

102 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

3.8K

13.4K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

106K

92.9K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

82.9K kg

294K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

51.7 µg/m³

36.1 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

75.7 µg/m³

55.5 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

42.6 µg/m³

15.6 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

26 µg/m³

71 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Al AḩmadīKhorramshahr· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
022545022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Al Aḩmadī and Khorramshahr
DayAl AḩmadīKhorramshahr
22 Sept14087
23 Sept15096
24 Sept239132
25 Sept441138
26 Sept449100
27 Sept15787
28 Sept11576

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Khorramshahr leads here at 4.4%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Al Aḩmadī reads 141 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Khorramshahr reads 102 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) right now.

Frequently asked

Al Aḩmadī and Khorramshahr, answered

Which has more trees, Al Aḩmadī or Khorramshahr?

Khorramshahr, with roughly 13,353 trees inside its 2 km radius against 3,770. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Khorramshahr has the denser canopy at 4.4%.

Which has better air quality, Al Aḩmadī or Khorramshahr?

Khorramshahr right now, at AQI 102 against 141 — a gap of 39 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Al Aḩmadī needs about 106,186 more to reach its canopy target, and Khorramshahr about 92,864. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Al Aḩmadī with somewhere else

This place

Al Aḩmadī

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.