Agra vs Ghāziābād
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Agra has more tree cover — 37.3% against 26.8%.
Ghāziābād has cleaner air right now — AQI 132 against 140.
- Tree cover gap
- 10.5 points
- Agra is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 8 AQI
- Ghāziābād is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 28.3K
- Agra has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
37.3%
26.8%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
140 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
132 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
112K
84.2K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
25.8K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
2.5M kg
1.9M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Ghāziābād is read from nearby ground stations and Agra is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
32.8 µg/m³
48.2 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Agra leads here at 37.3%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Agra reads 140 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Ghāziābād reads 132 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) right now.
Frequently asked
Agra and Ghāziābād, answered
Which has more trees, Agra or Ghāziābād?
Agra, with roughly 112,494 trees inside its 2 km radius against 84,195. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Agra has the denser canopy at 37.3%.
Which has better air quality, Agra or Ghāziābād?
Ghāziābād right now, at AQI 132 against 140 — a gap of 8 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Agra needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Ghāziābād about 25,761. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
Build your own
Compare Agra with somewhere else
This place
Agra
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.