Abū Kabīr vs Al-'Ubūr
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Abū Kabīr has more tree cover — 34.9% against 7.0%.
Abū Kabīr has cleaner air right now — AQI 64 against 153.
- Tree cover gap
- 27.9 points
- Abū Kabīr is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 89 AQI
- Abū Kabīr is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 87.7K
- Abū Kabīr has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
34.9%
7.0%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
64 · Moderate
153 · Unhealthy
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
110K
22.0K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
104K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
2.4M kg
484K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Al-'Ubūr is read from nearby ground stations and Abū Kabīr is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
18.3 µg/m³
59.4 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Abū Kabīr | Al-'Ubūr |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 57 | 57 |
| 23 Sept | 59 | 59 |
| 24 Sept | 51 | 50 |
| 25 Sept | 43 | 47 |
| 26 Sept | 43 | 47 |
| 27 Sept | 51 | 46 |
| 28 Sept | 68 | 65 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Abū Kabīr leads here at 34.9%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Abū Kabīr reads 64 (moderate) and Al-'Ubūr reads 153 (unhealthy) right now.
Frequently asked
Abū Kabīr and Al-'Ubūr, answered
Which has more trees, Abū Kabīr or Al-'Ubūr?
Abū Kabīr, with roughly 109,642 trees inside its 2 km radius against 21,991. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Abū Kabīr has the denser canopy at 34.9%.
Which has better air quality, Abū Kabīr or Al-'Ubūr?
Abū Kabīr right now, at AQI 64 against 153 — a gap of 89 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Abū Kabīr needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Al-'Ubūr about 103,673. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Abū Kabīr vs Fāqūs35% tree cover · AQI 71Compare
- Abū Kabīr vs Zagazig7% tree cover · AQI 60Compare
- Abū Kabīr vs As Sinbillāwayn45% tree cover · AQI 64Compare
- Abū Kabīr vs Bilbeis32% tree cover · AQI 58Compare
- Abū Kabīr vs Al Khuşūş1% tree cover · AQI 75Compare
- Abū Kabīr vs New Cairo10% tree cover · AQI 135Compare
Build your own
Compare Abū Kabīr with somewhere else
This place
Abū Kabīr
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.