Abū al-Kahṣīb vs Umm Qaşr
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Abū al-Kahṣīb has more tree cover — 5.8% against 1.2%.
Abū al-Kahṣīb has cleaner air right now — AQI 66 against 160.
- Tree cover gap
- 4.6 points
- Abū al-Kahṣīb is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 94 AQI
- Abū al-Kahṣīb is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 14.3K
- Abū al-Kahṣīb has more standing.
Iraq
Iraq
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
5.8%
1.2%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
66 · Moderate
160 · Unhealthy
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
18.1K
3.8K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
75.6K
122K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
398K kg
82.9K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
19.4 µg/m³
72.9 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
33.3 µg/m³
86.1 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
11 µg/m³
19.5 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
44 µg/m³
32 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Abū al-Kahṣīb | Umm Qaşr |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 87 | 136 |
| 23 Sept | 96 | 132 |
| 24 Sept | 132 | 183 |
| 25 Sept | 138 | 254 |
| 26 Sept | 100 | 190 |
| 27 Sept | 87 | 135 |
| 28 Sept | 66 | 150 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Abū al-Kahṣīb leads here at 5.8%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Abū al-Kahṣīb reads 66 (moderate) and Umm Qaşr reads 160 (unhealthy) right now.
Frequently asked
Abū al-Kahṣīb and Umm Qaşr, answered
Which has more trees, Abū al-Kahṣīb or Umm Qaşr?
Abū al-Kahṣīb, with roughly 18,112 trees inside its 2 km radius against 3,770. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Abū al-Kahṣīb has the denser canopy at 5.8%.
Which has better air quality, Abū al-Kahṣīb or Umm Qaşr?
Abū al-Kahṣīb right now, at AQI 66 against 160 — a gap of 94 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Abū al-Kahṣīb needs about 75,570 more to reach its canopy target, and Umm Qaşr about 121,894. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
Build your own
Compare Abū al-Kahṣīb with somewhere else
This place
Abū al-Kahṣīb
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.