Skip to content
Airleaf

Abomey-Calavi vs Ashaiman

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Abomey-Calavi has more tree cover — 16.0% against 6.3%.

Abomey-Calavi has cleaner air right now — AQI 28 against 86.

Tree cover gap
9.7 points
Abomey-Calavi is ahead.
Air quality gap
58 AQI
Abomey-Calavi is cleaner.
Trees between them
22.2K
Abomey-Calavi has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

16.0%

6.3%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

28 · Good

86 · Moderate

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

42.0K

19.8K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

36.8K

74.5K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

924K kg

435K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Ashaiman is read from nearby ground stations and Abomey-Calavi is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

6.8 µg/m³

28.8 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Abomey-CalaviAshaiman· daily US EPA index, last 6 days
0255022 Sept25 Sept27 Sept
Daily air quality index for Abomey-Calavi and Ashaiman
DayAbomey-CalaviAshaiman
22 Sept3131
23 Sept2428
24 Sept3641
25 Sept3838
26 Sept3837
27 Sept3033

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Abomey-Calavi leads here at 16.0%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Abomey-Calavi reads 28 (good) and Ashaiman reads 86 (moderate) right now.

Frequently asked

Abomey-Calavi and Ashaiman, answered

Which has more trees, Abomey-Calavi or Ashaiman?

Abomey-Calavi, with roughly 42,022 trees inside its 2 km radius against 19,792. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Abomey-Calavi has the denser canopy at 16.0%.

Which has better air quality, Abomey-Calavi or Ashaiman?

Abomey-Calavi right now, at AQI 28 against 86 — a gap of 58 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Abomey-Calavi needs about 36,769 more to reach its canopy target, and Ashaiman about 74,456. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Abomey-Calavi with somewhere else

This place

Abomey-Calavi

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.