Skip to content
Airleaf

6th of October City vs Al Ḩawāmidīyah

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Al Ḩawāmidīyah has more tree cover — 40.9% against 0.0%.

Both are reading the same air quality index.

Tree cover gap
40.9 points
Al Ḩawāmidīyah is ahead.
Air quality gap
0 AQI
Both reading the same.
Trees between them
128K
Al Ḩawāmidīyah has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

0.0%

40.9%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

58 · Moderate

58 · Moderate

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

0

128K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

94.2K

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

0 kg

2.8M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

15.6 µg/m³

15.6 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

29.2 µg/m³

29.2 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

19.1 µg/m³

19.1 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

53 µg/m³

53 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

6th of October CityAl Ḩawāmidīyah· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for 6th of October City and Al Ḩawāmidīyah
Day6th of October CityAl Ḩawāmidīyah
22 Sept6666
23 Sept6464
24 Sept5757
25 Sept5656
26 Sept5656
27 Sept5959
28 Sept6767

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Al Ḩawāmidīyah leads here at 40.9%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: 6th of October City reads 58 (moderate) and Al Ḩawāmidīyah reads 58 (moderate) right now.

Frequently asked

6th of October City and Al Ḩawāmidīyah, answered

Which has more trees, 6th of October City or Al Ḩawāmidīyah?

Al Ḩawāmidīyah, with roughly 128,491 trees inside its 2 km radius against 0. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Al Ḩawāmidīyah has the denser canopy at 40.9%.

Which has better air quality, 6th of October City or Al Ḩawāmidīyah?

Both are reading 58 on the US EPA index at the moment. Air quality changes through the day, so this can separate within hours.

How many more trees does each city need?

6th of October City needs about 94,248 more to reach its canopy target, and Al Ḩawāmidīyah about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare 6th of October City with somewhere else

This place

6th of October City

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.